Coronavirus Aid for Regime Change: Washington’s 13 Point Plan for Venezuela

Washington’s demands include expelling all Cuban personal, including doctors fighting COVID-19, and handing power over to the US-backed opposition.

The State Department released what it called its “democratic transition framework for Venezuela” yesterday; a 13-point plan for the removal of Nicolas Maduro and a radical overhaul of the country’s political system. The principal and most fundamental change Washington proposes is to “restore all powers to the National Assembly,” the one branch of government the right-wing pro-U.S. opposition coalition currently holds. This would place the entire country under the control of political groups that have not won a general election in Venezuela since 1993.

In point number three, the U.S. also demands that “all foreign security forces depart immediately.” Here, they are presumably not speaking about the U.S.-linked far-right Colombian death squads that have been known to penetrate the countries’ long and porous border, but about Cuban security advisors and medical personnel. The United States is currently waging a silent war against the Caribbean island, pressuring countries to refuse its medical aid during the coronavirus pandemic. U.S.-backed regimes in Brazil and Bolivia both expelled Cuban doctors from their countries upon coming to power, with Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro claiming that they were “costumed doctors” who were there to “create guerilla cells and indoctrinate people.” Brazil’s Health Ministry is now asking them to return even as its president continues to deny COVID-19 is a serious problem.

According to the State Department’s transition plan, all political offices in Venezuela will be liquidated and their positions filled with people chosen by the National Assembly – i.e. the Venezuelan opposition. This includes the National Electoral Council, the Supreme Court, the Council of State and the presidency. The National Assembly has been in limbo ever since 2017 when the Supreme Court ruled it was in contempt of court. During the previous elections, a few new members of the National Assembly were tried for vote buying, but the institution refused to recognize the Supreme Court, instead demanding all power be given to it, hence the three-year-long constitutional crisis. Only after the National Assembly has handpicked the new Council of State, who, in turn, choose the president, will the U.S. begin to lift sanctions, the State Department claims. However, it promises, the World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Inter-American Development Bank (all institutions that have attempted to overthrow the socialist government) will be there to flood the country with foreign loans. The IMF recently refused an emergency COVID–19 loan to Venezuela unless Maduro stepped down.

The American proposal is unlikely to attract interest from Venezuela. “It’s a little hard to see how this is going to be convincing to the major players in the government,” said David Smilde, an anti-Maduro academic at the Washington Office for Latin America. Steve Ellner, a government-sympathetic professor at the Universidad de Oriente in Puerto La Cruz, suggested that the IMF’s actions would only “add to resentment against Washington” worldwide, also noting that many in the opposition coalition actually favor dialogue and working with the government during the pandemic.

The American proposal has not attracted interest from the Venezuelan government, President Maduro dismissing it outright. While Maduro holds very low approval ratings, he was democratically elected in 2013 and 2018 in some of the most internationally monitored elections in the world. Around 150 foreign observers, including three teams of seasoned election officials who produced reports, watched the 2018 vote. Among them was former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, who said, “I do not have any doubt about the voting process. It is an advanced automatic voting system.” Former Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa agreed, praising its “impeccable” organization. In 2012 former president Jimmy Carter described Venezuela’s system as “the best in the world.”

Nevertheless, the U.S. government refused to recognize the results, imposing sanctions on the country. An American Special Rapporteur for the U.N., Alfred de Zayas, visited Venezuela and denounced them, accusing Trump of “crimes against humanity” and estimating that they were responsible for over 100,000 deaths. The international community has called for all U.S. sanctions to be halted.

After a series of secret negotiations, the U.S. government immediately backed self-declared president Juan Guaidó’s audacious coup attempts last year. Guaidó, head of the National Assembly, insisted that Maduro was illegitimate and he should be made president. While he was lauded in Washington, even receiving a standing ovation from both Republicans and Democrats at Trump’s state of the union address, his attempts were largely rejected by the Venezuelan public. The most recent poll showed him with a 10 percent approval rate and a 68.5 disapproval rating among his country folk. He was unceremoniously removed from his position as National Assembly chair by his own coalition in January.

The State Department’s most recent announcement is another in a long line of efforts by Washington to unseat the ruling socialist party – a chain of attempts going back to at least 2002. This was made explicit by special Venezuela representative Elliott Abrams: “The plan is not so much an effort to change Nicolas Maduro’s mind as it is to appeal to everyone else in Venezuela to change his mind for him,” he told a briefing. However, it is far from clear whether it will have this effect. Steve Ellner, a government-sympathetic professor at the Universidad de Oriente in Puerto La Cruz, suggested that recent actions would only “add to resentment against Washington” worldwide, also noting that many in the opposition coalition actually favor dialogue and working with the government during the pandemic. Like Mike Pence and Mike Pompeo’s previous calls for the military to rebel and overthrow Maduro, the State Department’s transition plan will likely be ignored inside Venezuela. With a global pandemic threatening to hit the country, Venezuelans likely have more important things to think about.

Feature photo | Special Representative for Venezuela Elliott Abrams, right, accompanied by State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus, left, speaks at a news conference, March 31, 2020, in Washington. Andrew Harnik | AP

Alan MacLeodis a Staff Writer for MintPress News. After completing his PhD in 2017 he published two books: Bad News From Venezuela: Twenty Years of Fake News and Misreporting and Propaganda in the Information Age: Still Manufacturing Consent. He has also contributed to Fairness and Accuracy in ReportingThe GuardianSalonThe GrayzoneJacobin MagazineCommon Dreams the American Herald Tribune and The Canary.

Republish our stories! MintPress News is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 International License.

Coronavirus prepared at the bio-weapons laboratory in the US

The SARS-CoV-2 virus may have originated at the Fort Detrick lab, escaped into the wild due to lax safety precautions and infected military personnel at the base.

Politics A- A A+

US expert Dennis Etler shared his views with Eurasia Diary regarding the spread of Coronavirus-COVID-19 in the world as well as the role of the United States in the origination of this terrible disease.  

“Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson has raised the question as to whether the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) actually originated in the US, not China. His suggestion has raised hackles in the US media and government. Zhao, however, has not accused Washington of launching a bio-weapon attack against China, he has just raised some pertinent questions that need to be answered.

Using a contagious virus as a bio-weapon makes no strategic sense. It would and obviously did backfire if the intent was to derail China’s economy. In the long-run it will do the exact opposite, it will ruin the Western economies and strengthen China’s economy. The modelers in the “deep state” would surely understand this. The logic of launching a viral attack creating a pandemic thus doesn’t make much strategic sense.

But there is countervailing evidence that the virus itself had its origins outside of China;

1) In August 2019 the bio-weapons lab at Fort Detrick was shut down because of safety concerns. One of the special agents being researched there was the SARS-CoV coronavirus. It seems that waste water from the plant was contaminated. So, there is a potential source for a SARS-CoV coronavirus (the COVID-19 virus is SARS-CoV-2) that may have escaped into the wild and infected military personnel.

2) Soon thereafter, in October 2019, US military personnel participated in the International Military Games held in Wuhan. It is feasible that some of the roughly 300 US military participating in the games may have been infected with the virus.

3) Genetic evidence shows that the ancestral form of the virus is not found in China but has been found in the USA and Europe.

4) Reports indicate that US military stationed in Afghanistan have had COVID-19-like symptoms but have not been tested for it, suggeting that early carriers of the virus may have mistaken it for the flu since young, healthy military personnel would most likely have very mild or asymptomatic cases of COVID-19 that went unrecognized. This would be particularly true before the disease spread into Wuhan and infected more vulnerable people who got severe symptoms.

5) The US has been very secretive about the outbreak and held classified White House meetings that medical specialists did not attend, because they lacked security clearances, suggesting the intelligence service attendees knew more than they have let on about the virus..

6) On Nov. 18, 2019 a conference on preparations for a coronavirus pandemic (EVENT 201) was held in New York attended by private and public figures. Nonetheless, Washington has feigned total ignorance of the potential for any impending pandemic.

There are other unsubstantiated claims that have circulated on-line, but that doesn’t take away from the evidence discussed above.

The conclusion seems to be that the SARS-CoV-2 virus may have originated at the Fort Detrick lab, escaped into the wild due to lax safety precautions and infected military personnel at the base. The virus then spread within the military, mutated into a number of haplotypes and was introduced to Wuhan during the International Military Games,

No conspiracy, but typical lax security and poor procedures by the US military that led to the virus being spread in Wuhan, leading to the local epidemic and the subsequent global pandemic.

The above evidence should not be dismissed out of hand, as it should be read and investigated by a neutral international team of forensic experts.”

Картинки по запросу

Dennis Etler is an expert on Chinese Studies. Mr Etler holds a doctorate in anthropology from the University of California, Berkley. He conducted archaeological and anthropological research in China throughout the 1980s and 1990s and taught at the college and university level for over 35 years.


Report a mistake by marking it and pressing Ctrl+Enter

EurasiaDiary © Must be hyperlinked when used.

Follow us:
Twitter: @Eurasia_Eng
Facebook: EurasiaEng

Ininterrotti crimini di guerra in Yemen dalla criminale coalizione saudita, in un vergognoso silenzio globale

A cura di Enrico Vigna


Mentre la coscienza della solidarietà internazionale è attenuata e l’attenzione internazionale langue, sepolta dalla disinformazione o peggio dall’indifferenza, quelle organizzazioni che affermano di essere impegnate per i “diritti umani”, si rivelano estranee o distratte  circa l’eccidio sistematico commesso dalla coalizione americano-saudita e loro complici, contro civili, donne e bambini, sistematicamente e ferocemente da cinque anni, ogni giorno nello Yemen.


Dove sono i cantori del “dirittoumanesimo” globale, gli accusatori di “regimi e stati canaglia” indicati da USA e Israele, i praticanti le varie  “rivoluzioni colorate” in ogni dove ci sono  ingiustizie…tranne dove possono infastidire o contrastare interessi NATO o statunitensi?

Perché non levano le loro voci influenti “mediaticamente ed economicamente”, perché tacciono?

Nello Yemen da cinque si attua anni una guerra soprattutto sulla popolazione che vive in prima linea, sottoposta a attacchi indiscriminati che continuano senza sosta, senza alcuna segnale di discontinuità.

Una guerra che ha prodotto finora 3 milioni 650.000 sfollati, continuamente in crescita.

Una aggressione spietata dove non esiste la parola umanitario, dove il cosiddetto diritto internazionale umanitario che dovrebbe proteggere i civili, all’interno di un conflitto è quotidianamente calpestato nel silenzio, letale, internazionale.




Secondo molti testimoni e denunce, la coalizione saudita utilizza armamenti USA, prodotti e forniti dalla società Gazal Dynamics, che è fornitrice del sistema aeronautico americano, il quale ha in dotazione  bombe e missili come l’Mk 82, un missile a caduta libera leggera.

La coalizione guidata da Arabia Saudita e Stati Uniti non rispetta i minimi obblighi ai sensi delle leggi di guerra, e utilizza l’armamento statunitense in attacchi palesemente sproporzionati e indiscriminati, che provocano migliaia di vittime civili e danni a strutture civili nel paese arabo.

Dal marzo 2015, la coalizione saudita, ha iniziato questa guerra contro lo Yemen con l’obiettivo dichiarato di schiacciare il movimento Houthi di Ansarullah, che aveva preso il potere e cacciato il fedele alleato di Riyadh, l’ex presidente fuggitivo Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi.

Ininterrotti crimini di guerra in Yemen dalla criminale coalizione saudita, in un vergognoso silenzio globale      
Anche secondo il quotidiano La Repubblica: “… Nello Yemen, negli ultimi mesi la crisi umanitaria si è ulteriormente aggravata, restando il punto del mondo dove si sta consumando la tragedia peggiore degli ultimi trent’anni. Un conflitto che, così come è avvenuto in Siria, colpisce soprattutto la popolazione civile, fin dall’inizio della guerra. Dallo scorso dicembre, infatti, nella sostanziale indifferenza della cosiddetta “comunità internazionale” e della maggior parte del sistema mediatico, qualcuno si è messo a calcolare che, di fatto, tre civili ogni giorno vengono uccisi, in media una vittima ogni 8 ore. ..Tre anni e oltre 600.000 persone yemenite morte e ferite, impedendo ai pazienti di recarsi all’estero per cure e bloccando l’ingresso delle medicine nel paese dilaniato dalla guerra…”.

Dopo gli innumerevoli bombardamenti sulle infrastrutture civili e gli ospedali, oggi sono oltre 2.400 i morti di colera e la crisi ha innescato quello che le Nazioni Unite hanno descritto come il peggior disastro umanitario del mondo.

Gli abitanti della provincia di Hodeidah hanno organizzato manifestazioni di protesta per le aggressioni criminali nel loro territorio contro la popolazione.
Una manifestazione di protesta è stata organizzata dagli  abitanti della provincia di Hodeidah per condannare l’ultimo crimine commesso dagli attacchi aerei sauditi contro i prigionieri nella provincia di Dhamar.
I partecipanti hanno lanciato slogan ed esposto  striscioni per denunciare i crimini del terribile massacro, che ha lasciato decine di prigionieri morti e feriti, che erano elencati nell’accordo di scambio firmato a Stoccolma.

La popolazione ha urlato il suo sdegno e ritiene le Nazioni Unite e la comunità internazionale pienamente responsabili degli atroci crimini commessi dall’aggressione contro il popolo yemenita.
Il 1° settembre l’aggressione aerea di USA-Arabia Saudita aveva lanciato sette incursioni su un edificio utilizzato per prigionieri di guerra a nord della provincia di Dhamar. Più di 150 persone sono state uccise e ferite nel massacro, mentre ancora continua il processo di recupero dei corpi delle vittime.      3 settembre 2019


A cura di Enrico Vigna, CIVG

Preso da:

USA: un documento del Federal Protective Service dice che i suprematisti bianchi vogliono usare il coronavirus come arma biologica

di Michele Metta

Quello che vi mostro e commento oggi è un documento che etichettare come sconvolgente è, assolutamente, non retorico.

Si tratta di un bollettino del Federal Protective Service, organo che fa capo al Dipartimento per la Sicurezza Nazionale degli Stati Uniti. Quel che emerge, è la volontà dei cosiddetti “suprematisti bianchi” di usare il coronavirus come mezzo per raggiungere i loro deliranti scopi.

In dettaglio, tra le loro mire si elencano quelle di sterminare le minoranze diffondendo tra queste il più possibile la malattia, vaporizzando il virus nei luoghi pubblici dove vivono in prevalenza comunità non di pelle bianca. Idem per i tasti degli ascensori, e le maniglie dei portoni. Operazioni dichiaratamente ispirate alle teorie di James Mason, sessantottenne pedofilo e guru neonazista USA, il quale predica la supposta necessità, tramite disordine, guerra civile, e morte, di un nuovo ordine mondiale basato sul dominio ariano.

È importantissimo sottolineare che il documento risale al febbraio di quest’anno; momento, cioè, in cui Trump negava la possibile diffusione della malattia nel proprio territorio nazionale. Coincidenza vuole che Mason sia un grande sostenitore proprio di Donald Trump.

Un documento, insomma, che fa sorgere non poche domande circa il momento che noi tutti stiamo vivendo.

Notizia del:

A Man-Made Virus?

The Vatican says the coronavirus was created in a “laboratory in a powerful and wealthy country”

Cardinal and Archbishop of Colombo Malcolm Ranjith, is convinced that the Covid-19 coronavirus was created by the hands of man in the “laboratory of a powerful and wealthy country”. The Cardinal demanded that the United Nations initiate an investigation in this regard, and that those responsible are prosecuted on charges of genocide and are punished. This was reported by the correspondent of the Italian newspaper Il Messaggero.

“Some viruses,” he noted, “that we have been talking about in recent days, are the product of unscrupulous experiments. We must prohibit experiments of this type that lead to loss of lives and cause pain and suffering for all mankind… These types of research are not carried out by individuals in poor countries, but are carried out in the laboratories of rich states. Producing such things is a very serious crime against humanity. I pray to God that he helps to discover those who have sown this poison. I think that the United Nations should step up to understand how this incident arose and punish those responsible. Such research should be prohibited.”

Who created the virus?

The Vatican Cardinal does not explicitly name which country he accuses of creating the virus, but it is not difficult to guess who he means when referring to the laboratory of a “rich and powerful country”.

As Larry Romanoff, a columnist at the Canadian Global Research Center, said recently, the coronavirus was created in the United States. According to him, the virus definitely did not arise in the seafood market in Chinese Wuhan, where the epidemic broke out. He believes that he was most likely brought there from outside, and even named the location of the biological weapons laboratory.

“The only possible source of the coronavirus is the United States because only this country has all branches of the evolutionary tree of coronaviruses. The original source of the COVID-19 virus was the US military laboratory at Fort Detrick,” said Romanoff.

The expert’s findings are based on research by Japanese and Taiwanese epidemiologists. He recalled that last August, a wave of pneumonia took place in the United States, the source of which Americans said was vaping. Several cases of the disease were lethal. At that time, a doctor from Taiwan warned the United States that the cause of pneumonia could be coronavirus, but no one listened to him. Romanoff drew attention to the fact that just before the outbreak of the epidemic began, the United States somehow closed its main military bio-laboratory at Fort Detrick.

Laboratory of death

According to the media, in this laboratory they were experimenting with such dangerous microbes and toxins as Ebola virus, smallpox, anthrax, plague, as well as poison ricin. Epidemiological outbreaks were also investigated, and projects were carried out for government agencies, universities, and pharmaceutical companies. In April 2019, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases’ Department of Molecular and Translational Sciences issued a report on the results of studying coronavirus in bats, according to which… “a shortage of drugs capable of resisting pancoronavirus activity increases the vulnerability of public health systems to the highly pathogenic coronavirus pandemic.”

Even before the outbreak of the epidemic in China – August 31st, 2019 – the New York Times published a story about the development in the United States of a mysterious epidemic of a previously unknown lung disease, which at that time affected more than 200 people.

Cannabis, e-cigarettes, and vaping were suspected. However, those who did not smoke at all were also sick. And therefore the viral-bacterial nature of the severe disease of the lung system was not excluded. As of October 1st 2019 alone, 1,080 cases of the disease were recorded in 48 states and the Virgin Islands, including deaths.

He also drew attention to another mysterious episode related to the emergence of the virus. From October 18th to 27th last year, Wuhan hosted the next Military World Games, to which the Pentagon sent a delegation of several hundred people. In this regard, Global Research, with reference to Chinese social media publications, mentions five foreign athletes or other employees who were hospitalised in Wuhan with an infection unknown at the time. The subsequent explosive increase in morbidity generally corresponds to the standard incubation period of coronavirus established by doctors (about 14 days).

The Chinese representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Zhao Lijian, said in this regard on his Twitter page that a dangerous coronavirus had been brought to Wuhan by military personnel from the United States of America.

According to him, the US is obliged to explain why the disease appeared in Wuhan. Lijian also wrote that information appeared from Robert Redfield’s Center for Disease Control and Prevention, stating that there had been cases of people dying of influenza in the United States before the outbreak in Wuhan Province. However, after they died, they were found to have a dangerous coronavirus.

In the United States, this demarche by a representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China caused indignation. President Donald Trump accused China of spreading false information.

During a White House briefing, he said “China was spreading false information that our military gave them this [virus]. It is a lie. And instead of arguing, I have to name where it [the virus] came from. It really came from China,” said Trump. However, he did not say anything specific about the specific accusations made by the experts.

Meanwhile, the theory that the coronavirus could have been bred in bio-laboratories over the ocean, after which it deliberately or inadvertently went out of control, is shared by Russian experts.

For example, former member of the United Nations Biological Weapons Commission Igor Nikulin stated that “COVID-19 is assembled in three parts: bat coronavirus, snake coronavirus, and HIV component (human immunodeficiency virus) – glycoprotein protein. In nature, such a combination could not happen.”

As he told the Tsargrad news agency, there are more than enough grounds to suspect that the coronavirus is a US bio-weapon. Firstly, the time and place are too well chosen to be considered a mere coincidence. Currently it is the height of the trade war between China and the United States, and the American President Donald Trump said six months ago that if the Chinese don’t come to their senses, they will regret it. Why the outbreak happened in Wuhan, and not Beijing, Hong Kong, or Shanghai, is also roughly understandable. There’s a pro-American Maidan in Hong Kong. There are a lot of American missions in Shanghai, almost all American companies, and thousands of Americans work there, if not tens of thousands. And Beijing is the capital, there are too big control measures, there are a million cameras that record faces, explains the expert. They chose a place where control is easier, and the fact that there is an institute of virology is also good, it is possible to accuse the Chinese of arranging everything themselves, so successfully and during the New Year, noted Igor Nikulin.

“In addition, there was an American consulate in Wuhan,” he continued. “But they closed it, before the Chinese declared the epidemic,” said the expert. “So they knew about it beforehand? The information is also not in their favour,” noted Nikulin. “I.e., there are many details that show that it is not coincidental,” stressed the expert.

He also recalled that until 2000, the coronavirus had never been transmitted to humans. And since Americans adopted an ethnically specific biological weapons program in 1999, already 8 viruses out of 38 have moved from animals to humans.

How the vaccine was created

Reports from the United States that progress has been made in the development of a vaccine against the virus have also raised questions. How exactly the US managed to beat other countries in the development of a vaccine against coronavirus COVID-19 in a situation when it is impossible from the point of view of the technological process? Such a question was asked by the well-known journalist Sergey Kurginyan on the air of the talk show “Evening with Vladimir Solovyov” on the TV channel “Rossiya 1”.

“The Americans have officially declared that they will test the vaccine, right? How did they make it? Unlike many others, I believe Americans are a great technical nation… But other peoples aren’t idiots either. Neither Germans, nor Russians, nor Chinese. So, they were so ahead of the vaccine, so much so that it is impossible to get so technologically ahead,” said Kurginyan.

He noted that in this case the question arises as to how such an advance has occurred in technological terms? This is especially important in a situation where the virus was first recorded in China and when China was seemingly the first to start developing and testing the vaccine.

“You either skip certain stages of checks on rats and so on, or you don’t skip them, so then you started it when? These stages have a chronological sequence, they cannot be skipped! Are they disrupting the technology cycle or have they got it? And if they got it, it was like what? An antidote? So there is an end product?” continued Kurginyan.

As is known, today there are approximately 400 centers and laboratories in the United States in which biological weapons are being developed. And about 40 of them are located near the Russian borders.

Not long ago, the Russian Defense Ministry accused American scientists working in the Georgian Lugar medical center of experiments on people. The military released evidence that the United States, under the pretext of a “treatment center”, had established a secret biological weapons laboratory in Georgia – near the Russian borders. The experiments there have already killed 73 people.

This sensational information was first released by former Minister of State Security of Georgia Igor Giorgadze, who gave data on the death of 30 people who allegedly died in December 2015 during treatment in the laboratory against hepatitis C. In April and August 2016 there died respectively 30 and 13 people. And in the column “cause of death” it was written “unknown”, and an investigation into this was not carried out. The Russian Ministry of Defence distributed an official report on US military and biological activities on the Georgian territory. The information inside it confirms the Pentagon’s concept of contactless war. Its essence is the use of non-standard “ammunition”, which is now actively developed by Americans. Weapons can even be insects or animals infected with human-dangerous diseases.

If you let the genie out of the bottle…

The narrative of possible US involvement in the spread of the virus is described by many as a conspiracy theory. But that is what’s curious. With particular force, the epidemic broke out for some reason in two countries – China and Italy. At the same time, China is the main economic competitor of the United States on the world stage, and Italy is its most recalcitrant ally in Western Europe, where a “friend of Putin”, the leader of the Liga Nord, Matteo Salvini, is about to return to power again. Could that be a coincidence? Maybe, but it might not have been a coincidence too. Especially since the US has a great “track record” of trying to eliminate its political opponents with poisons and even biological weapons. Ranging from the numerous assassination attempts against Fidel Castro to the bizarre death of Venezuela’s popular leader Hugo Chávez.

But if this has already been done, why could the coronavirus not be the consequence of such American “experiments” no longer against the leader alone, but also a whole country? After all, they also did this before without hesitation – they bombed Serbia, and demolished Iraq and Libya.

They may, however, object by saying that the epidemic has now broken out in the United States itself. But it is known that if a genie is released from the bottle, even if accidentally, it starts to devour everyone indiscriminately, including those who released it.

Russian politician Franz Klintsevich said he was very cautious about all conspiracy theories related to coronavirus. However, in his opinion, most of the facts point to a laboratory in the US. “The conclusions are obvious: it is established that the virus is artificial and with a high degree of probability is linked with American soldiers,” said the politician.

Vladimir Malyshev


Bufale mainstream sull’epidemia di coronavirus in Iran

L’epidemia di coronavirus sta mettendo a nudo, in maniera obiettiva e senza alcuna possibilità di replica, i danni apportati dalle privatizzazioni ai Sistemi Sanitari Nazionali, la debolezza della narrazione dell’utilità pubblica del “privato” e la natura antipopolare e speculativa che ha assunto l’Unione Europea. Solo pericolosi estremisti del Libero Mercato possono continuare a sostenere privatizzazioni e/o l’utilità della UE.

Ci hanno raccontato per anni, da Berlusconi in poi, che gli ospedali erano un ricettacolo di nullafacenti, una spesa inutile, un costo che non potevamo più permetterci. Ed allora, tutti si sono scagliati sul Sistema Sanitario Nazionale, tagliando, regionalizzando, privatizzando, convenzionando e chiudendo. Il risultato è che quella che fino a 20 anni fa era tra le migliori Sanità del Mondo adesso registra la mortalità più alta per Coronavirus.
Bufale mainstream sull'epidemia di coronavirus in Iran

Nessuna scusante, nessun appello. L’unica sarebbe requisire la Sanità privata, ri-statalizzare il servizio sanitaria, assumere in massa e nazionalizzare la produzione di farmaci e macchinari. Ma purtroppo non sembra quella la strada intrapresa, al contrario si procede ancora sulla via del privato che continuerà a fare affari sulla salute dei cittadini.

E poi c’è l’UE che anche in questo caso, da questo orecchio non ci sente. Non darà alcun aiuto vero. Nessuna agevolazione, nessuna concessione a sforamenti: l’ideologia dell’ultraliberismo e del rigore europeista non deve essere messa in discussione per qualche migliaio di morti!

Ancor più se di un paese “cicala” come l’Italia, dove si campa anche troppo per i gusti della BCE.

Come se non bastasse, nel bel mezzo dell’epidemia in Europa, gli Stati Uniti inviano 30.000 soldati e centinaia di carri armati, per l’esercitazione NATO “Defend Europe 20”, in chiave anti-russa.

Come se non bastasse ancora arriva l’aiuto cinese: respiratori, mascherine e medici super specializzati. Si inizia a rompere un po’ il pregiudizio che si ha sulla Cina e sui cinesi, popolo che secondo alcuni governatori ed alcuni giornalisti con l’alito di grappa alle 9 di mattina, mangiano topi vivi, dormono in stanza con i maiali, buttano i morti nell’immondizia.

Lo smacco c’è, inutile negarlo. Ed allora si deve stroncare sul nascere qualunque “prurito”. Il messaggio che deve passare tra i cittadini è che non bisogna azzardarsi nemmeno a pensare di poter uscire dalla UE, perché fuori c’è solo morte e fame. E se si bazzica con la Cina si fa la fine… dell’Iran!

E’ infatti iniziata una campagna di denigrazione mainstream di questo paese mediorientale.

Non stiamo parlando di personaggi del bar prestati alla politica o al giornalismo. Ma di televisioni nazionali, di giornalisti “di sinistra” e di giornali di primo piano. La tesi, “accreditata” dalle testimonianze di oppositori al “regime” iraniano che dal loro salotto a Londra o New York riescono ad avere un punto di vista privilegiato sulla situazione del loro Paese d’origine, è di un “Olocausto”. Si presenta uno scenario di fosse comuni, di morti ammassati su una superficie pari a due campi da calcio (precisione incredibile) e di gente che muore sul marciapiede di fronte all’ospedale senza essere soccorsa, nemmeno si trattasse degli Stati Uniti!

Eppure i numeri ufficiali dicono di un numero di contagiati in calo, che la mortalità non è in situazione critica e, soprattutto, che i guariti sono 5.400 contro i 2.800 italiani. “E allora il regime mente!”.

E non basta constatare che nemmeno i media dei più acerrimi nemici dell’Iran (BBC e CNN) ne facciano menzione: gli italiani ci credono, quasi ad “autoconsolarsi” del fatto che siamo il Paese che probabilmente avrà più contagiati e più morti a fine epidemia, purtroppo.

In realtà la situazione, a quanto vedono con i propri occhi amici e parenti iraniani residenti a Teheran, Karaj, Shiraz (informazioni di prima mano di persone non legate agli Ayatollah), è ben diversa.

Certo, ci può essere un modo diverso e meno esteso per fare tamponi, dunque i numeri potrebbero essere più alti, come altrove del resto, ed i decessi di pazienti con pesanti patologie pregresse potrebbero anche essere ascritti alle patologie principali. Forse. Sicuramente anche lì, principalmente nel focolaio di Gilan, come tra l’altro in Lombardia, la Sanità sta avendo grossi problemi di intasamento. Ma una cosa è certa: lo Stato sta provando a contenere l’epidemia impiegando tutte le sue forze e certo non sta facendo morire per strada i cittadini.

Lo Stato iraniano, tramite polizia e pasdaran distribuisce gratuitamente in strada mascherine e guanti monouso, ci sono sanificazioni notturne, con soluzioni di acqua ed ipoclorito sparate sui muri, sui bancomat, ovunque. C’è un servizio di call center pubblico che chiama a casa i cittadini chiedendo se qualcuno in famiglia presenta sintomi, dando consigli e se necessario visitando a domicilio. Alcuni ospedali sono stati completamente evacuati dai pazienti normali che sono stati sistemati in altri ospedali, anche privati, precettati dallo Stato che contribuisce alle spese del paziente e sono stati istituti ospedali pubblici solo per pazienti affetti da coronavirus.

C’è da notare che i pazienti di Coronavirus sono curati gratuitamente a spese dello Stato in controtendenza al fatto che la Sanità iraniana prevede un contribuito molto elevato da parte del cittadino anche per i salva-vita (e questo è uno dei paradossi in un Paese in cui è tutto nazionalizzato, dalle pompe di benzina ai negozi di tappeti) il che si spiega anche col fatto che le sanzioni non hanno permesso all’Iran di acquistare brevetti e farmaci a prezzi accessibili dall’estero.

Non è stato necessario dichiarare il lockdown perché i cittadini hanno autonomamente deciso di mettersi in quarantena per contenere il virus e chi necessita di andare a lavorare, specialmente nei posti pubblici, vengono monitorati con la misurazione della temperatura all’entrata ed all’uscita dal posto di lavoro.

C’è inoltre un piccolo indennizzo per le famiglie che hanno un familiare che si è ammalato di Coronavirus. Si è anche concesso i domiciliari a molti detenuti che rischiavano di essere contagiati. Iran: 70.000 indultati. Italia: 0 indultati, 14 morti e centinaia di feriti dalla repressione statale.

Insomma, per quanto si possa concordare o dissentire con le misure intraprese dal governo iraniano, non si può certo pensare ad un paese che scava fosse per ammonticchiarci i morti. Questa è una narrazione utile a chi vuole spostare l’attenzione dal problema italiano e da quello della UE. E l’immaginario collettivo, di molti occidentali (anche di parecchi compagni), vede l’Iran come una sorta di retaggio del medioevo islamico.

In realtà si tratta di un Paese, certo, in sofferenza, ma anche industrializzato, con uno stato sociale, con un sistema pensionistico (vige “Quota 90”, 60 anni di età, 30 di contributi) con le parabole a vista che trasmettono la tv americana con tolleranza delle autorità nonostante lo stato di assedio, con un diritto e con delle garanzie per i detenuti, con dei partiti politici di centro, di destra e di “sinistra” (virgolette sono d’obbligo dato che la sinistra iraniana è per l’occidentalizzazione dei costumi e per concessioni sull’hijab, ma è anche per capitolare all’egemonia della UE e degli USA e per le privatizzazioni selvagge. Da questo punto di vista tutto il Mondo è Paese per le “sinistre”).

L’Iran è inoltre un Paese dove la condizione della donna, è molto migliore di quello che si possa pensare. Le donne iraniane sono libere ed emancipate, lavorano quasi tutte e tutte hanno una istruzione. Nulla a che vedere con il vero medioevo islamico, l’Arabia Saudita, che invece ci teniamo stretta come alleato politico e militare.

Sarebbe probabilmente il caso per gli italiani di smetterla di abboccare ai diversivi diffusi a piene mani da chi ci ha ridotto alla condizione attuale e di concentrarsi su quello che tra l’altro la Storia dimostra riuscirci meglio: riuscire ad invertire la tendenza nel momento in cui sembriamo più deboli.

Preso da:

COVID-19: All Truth Has Three Stages

Larry Romanoff

First, it is ignored.

Second, it is widely ridiculed.

Third, it is accepted as self-evident.

With COVID-19, we have now entered Stage 2. At first, the media ignored the claims and accumulating mountain of evidence that the virus originated in the US. But the spread of information and restatements of evidence from all sides, including in the US itself, has become too intense and now the claims are being openly ridiculed in the Western media.

Briefly, Chinese virologists discovered conclusively that the original source of the virus was not China, nor Wuhan, nor the seafood market, but had in fact been traced to the US, the most probable scenario being that the virus might have originated at the US Military’s bio-weapons lab at Fort Detrick (which was shut down by the CDC in July, because of outbreaks), and brought to China during the World Military Games.

Also, Japanese and Taiwanese virologists arrived independently at the conclusion – that the virus could have originated in the US.

The Americans did their best from before the beginning to deflect culpability by crafting tales of bats, snakes, pangolins, the seafood market, the Wuhan University being a bio-weapons facility (which it is not), and the CIA tale leaked through the VOA and Radio Free Asia that the virus leaked from that university. They stated (factually) that Chinese researchers had participated (7 years ago) in similar virus research funded by the US NIH, thus somehow insinuating Chinese culpability, ignoring that the prior research was irrelevant to current events.

I must say the Americans have proven to be very skillful in grabbing the microphone first, to create an “official” narrative of a current event while flooding the media with sufficient finger-pointing to preclude a gullible public the time to logically assemble the pieces on their own.

They ignored the very real fact that few nations would either create or release a biological weapon that attacks primarily itself. They ignored too, the geopolitical likelihood of an ”end game” – that a virus is a powerful weapon of economic warfare, able to do to China’s economy what a trade war could not do.

Casual readers tend to ignore the fact that, in the American mentality, there are many solid geopolitical reasons to attack China, Iran, and Italy, the remaining countries merely constituting unfortunate collateral damage.

Many virus articles containing this and similar information had been published by second-tier internet news sites, some articles gaining enormous readership with hundreds of thousands of downloads and much re-posting. Many of these articles have been translated into 6 or 7 languages and published on websites all around the world. Simultaneously, many posts were made on Chinese social media speculating on the odd circumstances and long chain of unusual coincidences that led to the virus outbreak in Wuhan.

One of the articles referred to above, was translated and posted on Chinese social media and gathered 76,000 comments in the first 8 hours. Eventually, the major Chinese media outlets made the same claims – that the virus could have originated in the US and that the Americans were engaging in a massive cover-up.

Then, Zhao LiJian, a spokesman for China’s Foreign Ministry, made the story official, through a number of posts on US social media. One major media article, this in the NYT, noted that “Zhao’s remarks were spread on China’s most prominent social media platform, Weibo . . . [and] had been viewed more than 160 million times, along with screenshots of the original Twitter posts.

It seems LiJian’s Twitter posts, being essentially an official source that could not easily be ignored, claiming the virus was brought to China from the US during the Military Games, and demanding an explanation from the US, were receiving too much public attention to be ignored. All of the above created sufficient political pressure to force the Western media to respond. And of course they responded by ignoring the facts of the message and trashing the messenger.

On March 12, the UK Guardian ran a story claiming China was “pushing propaganda” about the virus coming from the US. (1) On March 13, the New York Times ran a similar story of a “China coronavirus conspiracy” of false claims about the source of the virus. (2) Then, on March 14, ABC News ran a story titled “False claims about sources of coronavirus cause spat between the US, China”, in which it ridiculed China and the claims of a US-virus. (3)

The Seattle Times published a version of the story, stating, “China is pushing a new theory about the origins of the coronavirus: It is an American disease . . . introduced by members of the U.S. Army who visited Wuhan in October. There is not a shred of evidence to support that, but the notion received an official endorsement from China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, whose spokesman accused American officials of not coming clean about what they know about the disease.” (4) The UK Independent published their own version of “China’s conspiracy theory” (5), as did CNN (6).

The ABC article claimed that “Assistant Secretary David Stilwell gave [Chinese] Ambassador Cui Tiankai a “very stern representation of the facts,” claiming Cui was “very defensive” in the face of this “official” American assault. The US State Department is quoted as having said, “We wanted to put the [Chinese] government on notice we won’t tolerate [conspiracy theories] for the good of the Chinese people and the world.”

Following that, the Washington Post, Bloomberg, and half a dozen other press wires and media outlets have contacted this author for interviews, eager for an opportunity to trash this ‘conspiracy theory’ at its source. The US Embassy in Beijing also “reached out” to the author “to talk about it”.

If the public information campaign and the resulting political pressure can continue, we will eventually enter stage three where the media will begin admitting first the possibility, then the likelihood, then the fact, of the US being the source of the “China” virus.

Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He can be contacted at: He is a frequent contributor to Global Research.









Coronavirus was created by the USA to sink China, Italy is place to a social experiment.

The system has been making us stupid with Coronavirus for a long time, they talk to you about various stupid things, bats, snakes, created in China, etc …

but someone does not believe it: with documents in hand he gives evidence that the Coronavirus was created by the USA to destroy China.

Why years ago even literature and cinema produced novels and films in which there was talk of a pandemic that started right from China?

Why official NATO documents identify China as the enemy of the future?

Why in the same documents we talk about innovative weapons, selective viruses, capable of infecting some populations and others not?

Why do we speak openly of studying the effects not of the epidemic but of studying the “social” effects on the population? That is, how does the population react to prohibitions, limitations, deprivation of freedom?

Why did Attali, a well-known “benefactor”, openly say that there is a need for a small global epidemic to create a global world government?

here is an interesting video:

Coronavirus: astounding coincidences

Published: 26 February 2020

Roberto Quaglia takes point of the situation on the coronavirus, after a week in Italy where nothing else is talked about.

source Pandora TV

original in italian with video:

il Coronavirus è stato creato dagli USA per affondare la Cina, l’ Italia è sede di un esperimento sociale.

è da tanto tempo che il sistema ci sta ricoglionendo con il Coronavirus, ti parlano di cavolate varie, pipistrelli, serpenti, creato in Cina ecc….

ma qualcuno non ci crede: con documenti alla mano da le prove che il Coronavirus è stato creato dagli USA per distruggere la Cina.

Perchè anni addietro persino la letteratura ed il cinema produceva romanzi e film in cui si parlava di una pandemia che partiva proprio dalla Cina?

Perchè documenti ufficiali NATO individuano la Cina come il nemico del futuro?

Perchè negli stessi documenti si parla di armi innovative, virus selettivi, in grado di infettare alcune popolazioni ed altre no?

Perchè si parla apertamente di studiare gli effetti non dell’ epidemia ma di studiare gli effetti “sociali” sulla popolazione?, cioè come la popolazione reagisce ai divieti, limitazioni, privazione della libertà.

Perchè Attali, noto “benefattore” disse apertamente cè bisogno di una piccola epidemia globale per arrivare ad un unico governo mondiale?

ecco un video interessante.
Visualizza immagine di origine

Coronavirus: sbalorditive coincidenze

Roberto Quaglia fa il punto della situazione sul coronavirus, dopo una settimana in cui in Italia non si parla d’altro.

Fonte PandoraTV

Preso da:

Una riflessione sul Coronavirus

By 20 Febbraio 2020

Cosa sono i laboratori BSL4? E quali sono le strane coincidenze accadute prima dello scoppio del problema Coronavirus?

di Paolo Buralli Manfredi e Joe Cossari – Melbourne (Australia)

I laboratori BLS, sono dei laboratori che trattano e studiano virus letali per gli esseri umani, questi laboratori vengono classificati su quattro livelli dal meno pericolosi ai più pericolosi, BSL1, BSL2, BSL3, BSL4, (Bio Sefity Level)
Il laboratorio da dove  è scaturita l’epidemia di Coronavirus si trova a Wuhan una città cinese che conta più di sessanta milioni di abitanti, ed il laboratorio in questione venne costruito nel 2014 con un progetto Franco-Cinese che prevedeva anche l’accesso di funzionari e ricercatori legati a doppio filo all’OMS (Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanita’) ma, la cosa che è veramente particolare è il tipo di laboratorio,  perché il laboratorio di Wuhan è classificato come BLS4, cioè un laboratorio che maneggia virus altamente letali per l’uomo.
Normalmente questi laboratori vengono costruiti su piccole isole o addirittura su piattaforme create ad hoc in mezzo al mare o comunque in mezzo al nulla, proprio per evitare che l’errore umano possa scatenare pandemie con possibili milioni di morti. Altra particolarità di tutta questa storia è che, un Coronavirus depotenziato fu depositato e brevettato nel 2015 negli Stati Uniti da una società inglese partecipata a maggioranza dallo Stato Inglese, con la possibilità di utilizzo dello stesso a partire dal 2018.

Singolare anche la simulazione che, la Fondazione Bill & Melinda Gates in collaborazione con il World Economics Forum che il 18 Ottobre 2019, qualche settimana prima del primo caso da Coronavirus, simula una possibile pandemia che parte dal Brasile e si diffonde in tutto il mondo  prevedendo una mortalità di circa  sessanta milioni di persone, evento chiamato “ Event 201” a Global Pandemic Exercise .
Sempre a ridosso del primo caso, proprio a Wuhan arrivarono trecento soldati americani per partecipare al Military War Games, precisamente il 15 Ottobre altra data vicina al primo caso conclamato di Coronavirus.
Ovviamente le domande nascono spontanee, perché i mezzi di informazione classici non hanno analizzato la sequenza dei fatti, non hanno informato delle stranezze che abbiamo scritto qui sopra, ma si sono limitati solo ad accusare lo Stato cinese di aver creato una possibile pandemia?
Perché tutte le notizie sul Coronavirus date alle popolazioni, sono solo superficiali e non approfondite?
Ecco come sempre la nostra attenzione va all’informazione che come al solito sembra seguire strade predeterminate e soprattutto unificate, globalizzate come quasi fossero dettate e uguali per tutti.
Chiudiamo non traendo conclusioni personali ma cercando di far riflettere tutti su questi eventi e sul fatto che, a volte se non sempre, bisognerebbe impegnarsi a cercare risposte differenti a quelle che i giornali e le televisioni ‘blasonate’ ci propinano, creando in noi una visione unica ed indiscutibile, che ci allinea su una opinione al limite con la manipolazione.

Originale con video: